Although there is general consensus on the necessity of evaluation for decision support in
major transport projects, there is no method that is universally accepted. Multi-criteria …

This paper develops and then applies a novel approach of combining cost-benefit analysis
(CBA) and multi-criteria analysis (MCA) within a road infrastructure development programme …

We demonstrate that multi-criteria analysis (MCA), though initially developed in the
operations research field, can be usefully applied within the context of the stakeholder …

For the evaluation of transport projects several aspects have to be taken into account. Not
only are pure economical effects important, but also ecological, spatial and social aspects …

We provide an in-depth comparison of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and multi-criteria analysis
(MCA) by, among other things, reviewing the literature which elaborates on the differences …

Decisions to invest in large-scale transport projects typically extend beyond traditional cost-
benefit analysis. Multi-criteria analysis methods such as multi-actor multi-criteria analysis …

The most widespread approach to transport appraisal is to combine cost‐benefit analysis
(CBA) with environmental assessments and public consultations. However, large‐scale …

The most common methodology applied so far to the evaluation of transport systems has
been conventional cost-benefit analysis (CBA)(Janic, 2003), which supported by traffic-and …

The topic of how major transport projects should be assessed continues to generate
disputes amongst academics, infrastructure specialists, investors and governments alike …

Transport decision processes have traditionally applied cost–benefit analysis (CBA) with
benefits mainly relating to time-savings, and costs relating to infrastructure and maintenance …