J Hunter - Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2012 - frontiersin.org
Why is this a useful thing to do? It's useful because the vast volume of material published each year (or each day) makes it difficult for researchers to stay up to date with their own …
EM Prager, KE Chambers, JL Plotkin… - Journal of …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
Progress in basic and clinical research is slowed when researchers fail to provide a complete and accurate report of how a study was designed, executed, and the results …
R Walker, P Rocha da Silva - Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015 - frontiersin.org
“Classical peer review” has been subject to intense criticism for slowing down the publication process, bias against specific categories of paper and author, unreliability …
With the emergence of online publishing, opportunities to maximize transparency of scientific research have grown considerably. However, these possibilities are still only …
Early career researchers (ECRs)—graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early stage independent investigators—represent the largest fraction of researchers in higher education …
Study Design A reader's ability to critically evaluate original research depends on clear reporting of the study design and methods. Reporting should include a general overview of …
A challenge in modern research is the common inability to repeat novel findings published in even the most “impactheavy” journals. In the great majority of instances, this may simply …
S Rauh, T Torgerson, AL Johnson, J Pollard… - Research Integrity and …, 2020 - Springer
Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the nature and extent of reproducible and transparent research practices in neurology publications. Methods The NLM catalog …
DJ Kravitz, CI Baker - Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2011 - frontiersin.org
The current system of publishing in the biological sciences is notable for its redundancy, inconsistency, sluggishness, and opacity. These problems persist, and grow worse, because …