Logic trees have become the most popular tool for the quantification of epistemic
uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA). In a logic-tree framework …

In the current practice of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), logic trees are widely
used to represent and capture epistemic uncertainty in each element of the models for …

This article explains the essential duality between logic tree analysis and sensitivity analysis
in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. The results of a logic tree analysis can be used …

An objection sometimes made against treating the weights of logic tree branches as
probabilities relates to the Kolmogorov axioms, but these are only an obstacle if one …

Any trustworthy probabilistic seismic‐hazard analysis (PSHA) has to account for the intrinsic
variability of the system (aleatory variability) and the limited knowledge of the system itself …

Logic trees have become a standard feature of probabilistic seismic hazard analyses
(PSHA) for determining design ground motions. A logic tree's purpose is to capture and …

In probabilistic seismic‐hazard analysis, epistemic uncertainties are commonly treated
within a logic‐tree framework in which the branch weights express the degree of belief of an …

Logic trees have become a popular tool in seismic hazard studies. Commonly, the models
corresponding to the end branches of the complete logic tree in a probabalistic seismic …

The inclusion of epistemic uncertainties, generally via logic trees (Kulkarni et al., 1984),
within probabilistic seismichazard assessments (PSHAs) is becoming standard for all types …

To account for the epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic seismic hazard and risk analysis,
multiple scientifically justifiable and defensible models are usually considered with a logic …