Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the nature and extent of reproducible
and transparent research practices in neurology publications. Methods The NLM catalog …

Journals can substantially influence the quality of research reports by including responsible
reporting practices in their Instructions to Authors. We assessed the extent to which 100 …

Background Published research informs international healthcare, yet only a few studies
have assessed the representation of authors, editors, and research from developing …

Importance: In today's climate of high healthcare costs and limited research resources, much
attention has been given to inefficiency in research. Open access to research data has been …

Background Reporting quality within the neurosurgical literature is low, limiting the ability of
journals to act as gatekeepers for evidence-based neurosurgical care. Journal policies …

Background: Recent reports in neuroscience, especially those concerning brain-injury and
neuroimaging, have revealed low reproducibility of results within the field and urged for …

Background and Purpose—Selective nonpublication will yield publication bias and a
published literature imperfectly representative of the full range of scientific findings. We …

Background Selective outcome reporting is a significant methodological concern.
Comparisons between the outcomes reported in clinical trial registrations and those later …

Background and Purpose—Preclinical research using animals often informs clinical trials.
However, its value is dependent on its scientific validity and reproducibility, which are, in …

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many scientific journals use double-blind peer review to
minimize potential reviewer bias concerning publication recommendations. However …