The reliability of event-related brain potential (ERP) scores depends on study context and
how those scores will be used, and reliability must be routinely evaluated. Many factors can …

Generalizability theory (G theory) provides a flexible, multifaceted approach to estimating
score reliability. G theory's approach to estimating score reliability has important advantages …

Failing to consider psychometric issues related to reliability and validity, differential deficits,
and statistical power potentially undermines the conclusions of a study. In research using …

Although it is widely accepted that data quality for event‐related potential (ERP) components
varies considerably across studies and across participants within a study, ERP data quality …

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) represent direct measures of neural activity that are
leveraged to understand cognitive, affective, sensory, and motor processes. Every ERP …

Although biological measurements are constrained by the same fundamental psychometric
principles as self‐report measurements, these essential principles are often neglected in …

If an ERP score is to reflect a trait-like characteristic or indicate if an intervention had an
effect over time, adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability of that ERP score …

In studies of event‐related brain potentials (ERPs), difference scores between conditions in
a task are frequently used to isolate neural activity for use as a dependent or independent …

Analysis of event-related potential (ERP) data includes several steps to ensure that ERPs
meet an appropriate level of signal quality. One such step, subject exclusion, rejects subject …

To ensure adequate reliability (ie, internal consistency), it is common in studies using event‐
related brain potentials (ERPs) to exclude participants for having too few trials. This practice …