Making the first cut: an analysis of academic medicine editors' reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review

HS Meyer, SJ Durning, DP Sklar, LA Maggio - Academic Medicine, 2018 - journals.lww.com
Purpose Manuscripts submitted to Academic Medicine (AM) undergo an internal editor
review to determine whether they will be sent for external peer review. Increasingly …

Should authors submit previous peer-review reports when submitting research papers? Views of general medical journal editors

JWL Cals, CD Mallen, LG Glynn… - The Annals of Family …, 2013 - Annals Family Med
Publishing research can be time consuming, as papers are often submitted and reviewed by
multiple journals before final acceptance. We hypothesized that attaching previous peer …

Peer-review and rejection causes in submitting original medical manuscripts

IRM Pastrana, AV Hernández… - Journal of Continuing …, 2020 - journals.lww.com
The purpose of specialized medical journals is to accurately disseminate the results of new
research. The peer-review process is crucial for journals to be able to fulfill this purpose …

“This manuscript was a complete waste of time”: reviewer etiquette matters

SJ Durning, DP Sklar, EW Driessen… - Academic …, 2019 - journals.lww.com
The peer review of manuscripts submitted to journals is a form of high-stakes assessment.
The acceptance or rejection of a manuscript can have major consequences for a …

Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal

E Frank - Preventive Medicine, 1996 - Elsevier
Background. Despite the pivotal role of peer review in the scientific process, there has never
been a formal study of the way in which reviewers' opinions are elicited. This article …

Struggling to reply to reviewers: Some advice for novice researchers

O Harvey, A Taylor, P Regmi… - … Prospect: Journal of …, 2022 - eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit
your paper to the journal), is a not uncommon occurrence. However, receiving such rejection …

Improving peer review: what authors can do

WL Baker, RJ DiDomenico… - American Journal of …, 2017 - academic.oup.com
Publishing manuscripts in the peer-reviewed literature is essential for the advancement of
both science and healthcare. 1 For those who work in academic environments, including …

Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?

K Shashok - BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008 - Springer
Background Peer review is assumed to improve the quality of research reports as tools for
scientific communication, yet strong evidence that this outcome is obtained consistently has …

Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports

G Bordage - Academic medicine, 2001 - journals.lww.com
Purpose Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of
papers accepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and …

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

L Tite, S Schroter - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2007 - jech.bmj.com
Background: Peer reviewers are usually unpaid and their efforts not formally acknowledged.
Some journals have difficulty finding appropriate reviewers able to complete timely reviews …