ERPs are widely and increasingly used to address questions in psychophysiological
research. As discussed in this special issue, a renewed focus on questions of reliability and …

There is considerable variability in the quantification of event‐related potential (ERP)
amplitudes and latencies. We examined susceptibility of ERP quantification measures to …

Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) approaches can be applied to the topographic
distribution of event‐related potential (ERP) signals to “decode” subtly different stimulus …

Event‐related potentials (ERPs) can be very noisy, and yet, there is no widely accepted
metric of ERP data quality. Here, we propose a universal measure of data quality for ERP …

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) represent direct measures of neural activity that are
leveraged to understand cognitive, affective, sensory, and motor processes. Every ERP …

Despite many developments in the methods of event‐related potentials (ERPs), little
attention has gone out to the statistical handling of ERP data. Trials are often averaged, and …

Since Wood and McCarthy's simulation study (Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 59:
249–260), the use of principal component analysis (PCA) as a tool for the identification and …

The term ERP component refers to one of the most important but most nebulous concepts in
ERP research. An ERP waveform unambiguously consists of a series of peaks and troughs …

The reliability of event-related potentials (ERPs) is an important factor determining the value
of studies relating ERP components to individual differences. However, studies examining …

One important decision in every event‐related potential (ERP) experiment is which electrode
site (s) to use in quantifying the ERP component of interest. A common approach is to …