Sanctions against private individuals have been widely used in the fight against terrorism,
but not without significant controversy. This book examines the complex institutional and …

In the Yusuf and Kadi judgments of 21 September 2005, the Court of First Instance endorsed
the Community practice of sanctioning individuals blacklisted by the United Nations (UN). It …

Since the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, and the contemporaneous
publication of the Stockholm Programme, the area of freedom, security and justice has …

No competence to review EC regulations implementing Security Council resolutions,
according to the Court of First Instance–Worst of both worlds: critique from the perspectives …

A serious lacuna in international relations is the absence of a possibility for individuals to
challenge decisions of international organizations. However, the right to legal remedy is a …

The UN and EU sanctions regimes against suspected terrorists at first clearly violated
commonly accepted due process standards. Both organizations gradually reformed the …

This article considers the September 2005 judgement from the Court of First Instance
involving the measures taken by the European Union (EU) to interdict terrorist financing. The …

The appearance of the EU as a security actor has nowhere been more apparent than in the
field of counter‐terrorism measures after 11 September 2001. This article looks at the …

Abstract The introduction of Security Council targeted financial and travel sanctions against
individuals involves a qualitative change in Security Council sanctions policy, which has …

Page 1 Punishing International Terrorists The Legal Framework for Policy Initiatives JOHN F.
MURPHY Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Contents: Tables Acknowledgments Introduction: Overview and …