The UN and EU sanctions regimes against suspected terrorists at first clearly violated
commonly accepted due process standards. Both organizations gradually reformed the …

The plague of international terrorism has not only resulted in a ripple effect on national
legislative activity, particularly in the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks, but it has also …

The United Nations Security Council's anti-terrorism regime constitutes a serious threat to
the legitimacy and unity of the United Nations system as a whole. Recent European Court of …

In the framework of the fight against international terrorism the UN Security Council (SC) has
adopted targeted sanctions against individuals and corporate entities. Furthermore, it has …

This article examines the UN Security Council's 1267 counterterrorism sanctions regime.
Initially adopted in 1999, this sanctions regime targets individuals and entities suspected of …

This chapter analyzes the reform of the counter-terrorism resolutions adopted by the United
Nations Security Council (UNSC) after the September 11, 2001, attacks. Focusing on the …

Since 2003, as part of its 'war on terror', the United States has taken the position that the UN
Commission on Human Rights and its successor, the UN Human Rights Council, as well as …

The human rights regime adopts a legalist approach to limit the harm the powerful may inflict
on the vulnerable The attacks of September 11, 2001 and the ensuing 'war against …

This article gives a comprehensive account of the shortcomings of the European Union's
(EU's) policy of sanctioning terrorist suspects and makes tentative suggestions on how to …

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Kadi I sought to promote certainty, but instead
produced a dangerous muddle. In requiring more formal judicial review of decisions by the …