“Snake-oil,”“quack medicine,” and “industrially cultured organisms:” biovalue and the commercialization of human microbiome research

MJ Slashinski, SA McCurdy, LS Achenbaum… - BMC medical …, 2012 - Springer
MJ Slashinski, SA McCurdy, LS Achenbaum, SN Whitney, AL McGuire
BMC medical ethics, 2012Springer
Background Continued advances in human microbiome research and technologies raise a
number of ethical, legal, and social challenges. These challenges are associated not only
with the conduct of the research, but also with broader implications, such as the production
and distribution of commercial products promising maintenance or restoration of good
physical health and disease prevention. In this article, we document several ethical, legal,
and social challenges associated with the commercialization of human microbiome …
Background
Continued advances in human microbiome research and technologies raise a number of ethical, legal, and social challenges. These challenges are associated not only with the conduct of the research, but also with broader implications, such as the production and distribution of commercial products promising maintenance or restoration of good physical health and disease prevention. In this article, we document several ethical, legal, and social challenges associated with the commercialization of human microbiome research, focusing particularly on how this research is mobilized within economic markets for new public health uses.
Methods
We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (2009–2010) with 63 scientists, researchers, and National Institutes of Health project leaders (“investigators”) involved with human microbiome research. Interviews explored a range of ethical, legal, and social dimensions of human microbiome research, including investigators’ perspectives on commercialization. Using thematic content analysis, we identified and analyzed emergent themes and patterns.
Results
Investigators discussed the commercialization of human microbiome research in terms of (1) commercialization, probiotics, and issues of safety, (2) public awareness of the benefits and risks of dietary supplements, and (3) regulation.
Conclusion
The prevailing theme of ethical, legal, social concern focused on the need to find a balance between the marketplace, scientific research, and the public’s health. The themes we identified are intended to serve as points for discussions about the relationship between scientific research and the manufacture and distribution of over-the-counter dietary supplements in the United States.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果