[HTML][HTML] A randomized-controlled phase 2 study of the MET antibody emibetuzumab in combination with erlotinib as first-line treatment for EGFR mutation–positive …

G Scagliotti, D Moro-Sibilot, J Kollmeier… - Journal of Thoracic …, 2020 - Elsevier
G Scagliotti, D Moro-Sibilot, J Kollmeier, A Favaretto, EK Cho, H Grosch, M Kimmich…
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2020Elsevier
Introduction The hepatocyte growth factor receptor mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)
is reported to be a negative prognostic marker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and involved in
resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Emibetuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal
bivalent MET antibody, blocks ligand-dependent and ligand-independent hepatocyte growth
factor/MET signaling. This phase 2 study compared erlotinib with and without emibetuzumab
in first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC. Methods Patients with stage IV …
Introduction
The hepatocyte growth factor receptor mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) is reported to be a negative prognostic marker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and involved in resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Emibetuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal bivalent MET antibody, blocks ligand-dependent and ligand-independent hepatocyte growth factor/MET signaling. This phase 2 study compared erlotinib with and without emibetuzumab in first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC.
Methods
Patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC and disease control after an 8-week lead-in with erlotinib (150 mg daily) were randomized to continue taking erlotinib with or without emibetuzumab (750 mg every 2 weeks). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included overall survival, overall response rate, safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory analysis of MET expression.
Results
No significant difference in median PFS was observed in the intent-to-treat population (9.3 months with emibetuzumab + erlotinib versus 9.5 months with erlotinib monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–1.23]). The median overall survival was 34.3 months with emibetuzumab plus erlotinib versus 25.4 months with erlotinib (HR = 0.74, 90% CI: 0.49–1.11). Emibetuzumab plus erlotinib was well tolerated, with peripheral edema and mucositis as the only adverse events occurring 10% or more frequently relative to erlotinib. Exploratory post hoc analysis showed an improvement of 15.3 months in median PFS for the 24 patients with the highest MET expression (MET expression level of 3+ in ≥90% of tumor cells) (20.7 with emibetuzumab + erlotinib versus 5.4 months with erlotinib [HR = 0.39, 90% CI: 0.17–0.91]).
Conclusions
No statistically significant difference in PFS was noted in the intent-to-treat population. Exploratory analysis confirmed that high MET expression is a negative prognostic marker for patients treated with erlotinib, indicating that emibetuzumab plus erlotinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果