ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis
International journal of epidemiology, 2014•academic.oup.com
Background: Previous studies have identified significant variability in attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prevalence estimates worldwide, largely explained by
methodological procedures. However, increasing rates of ADHD diagnosis and treatment
throughout the past few decades have fuelled concerns about whether the true prevalence
of the disorder has increased over time. Methods: We updated the two most comprehensive
systematic reviews on ADHD prevalence available in the literature. Meta-regression …
deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prevalence estimates worldwide, largely explained by
methodological procedures. However, increasing rates of ADHD diagnosis and treatment
throughout the past few decades have fuelled concerns about whether the true prevalence
of the disorder has increased over time. Methods: We updated the two most comprehensive
systematic reviews on ADHD prevalence available in the literature. Meta-regression …
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have identified significant variability in attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prevalence estimates worldwide, largely explained by methodological procedures. However, increasing rates of ADHD diagnosis and treatment throughout the past few decades have fuelled concerns about whether the true prevalence of the disorder has increased over time.
Methods: We updated the two most comprehensive systematic reviews on ADHD prevalence available in the literature. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to test the effect of year of study in the context of both methodological variables that determined variability in ADHD prevalence (diagnostic criteria, impairment criterion and source of information), and the geographical location of studies.
Results: We identified 154 original studies and included 135 in the multivariate analysis. Methodological procedures investigated were significantly associated with heterogeneity of studies. Geographical location and year of study were not associated with variability in ADHD prevalence estimates.
Conclusions: Confirming previous findings, variability in ADHD prevalence estimates is mostly explained by methodological characteristics of the studies. In the past three decades, there has been no evidence to suggest an increase in the number of children in the community who meet criteria for ADHD when standardized diagnostic procedures are followed.
Oxford University Press以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果