Results: Four parameters (anorectal lesions, longitudinal ulcers, aphthous ulcers, and cobblestone appearance) were significantly more common in patients with Crohn’s disease than in patients with intestinal tuberculosis. Four other parameters (involvement of fewer than four segments, a patulous ileocecal valve, transverse ulcers, and scars or pseudopolyps) were observed more frequently in patients with intestinal tuberculosis than in patients with Crohn’s disease. We hypothesized that a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease could be made when the number of parameters characteristic of Crohn’s disease was higher than the number of parameters characteristic of intestinal tuberculosis, and vice versa. Making these assumptions, we calculated that the diagnosis of either intestinal tuberculosis or Crohn’s disease would have been made made correctly in 77 of our 88 patients (87.5%), incorrectly in seven patients (8.0%), and would not have been made in four patients (4.5%).

Conclusions: A systematic analysis of colonoscopic findings is very useful in the differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease.