Antibiofilm effect of ozonized physiological saline solution on peri‐implant–related biofilm

CC Tonon, BHD Panariello… - Journal of …, 2021 - Wiley Online Library
Journal of Periodontology, 2021Wiley Online Library
Background Removal of dental plaque and local application of local chemical adjuncts, such
as chlorhexidine (CHX), have been used to control and treat peri‐implant disease. However,
these methods can damage the surface properties of the implants or promote bacterial
resistance. The application of ozone as an adjunctive treatment represents a new approach
in the management of peri‐implantitis. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the
antimicrobial effect of ozonized physiological saline solution in different concentrations …
Background
Removal of dental plaque and local application of local chemical adjuncts, such as chlorhexidine (CHX), have been used to control and treat peri‐implant disease. However, these methods can damage the surface properties of the implants or promote bacterial resistance. The application of ozone as an adjunctive treatment represents a new approach in the management of peri‐implantitis. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of ozonized physiological saline solution in different concentrations against oral biofilms developed on titanium surface.
Methods
Single and multi‐species biofilms of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Streptococcus oralis were formed on titanium specimens for 5 days in anaerobic conditions. Biofilms were treated with ozonized saline solution at different concentrations (25, 50, and 80 μg/NmL), for 30 seconds and 1 minute. CHX (0.12%) and saline solution (0.89% NaCl) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Bacterial viability was quantified by colony forming units (CFU mL−1), and biofilm images were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed by parametric test (ANOVA) with Tukey post‐hoc test (P < 0.05).
Results
Ozonized saline solution showed antibiofilm activity at a concentration of 80 μg/NmL for 30 seconds and 1 minute, reducing, mainly, Porphyromonas gingivalis viability, with 2.78 and 1.7 log10 CFU mL−1 of reduction in both single and multi‐species biofilms, respectively, when compared to the control (saline), whereas CHX reduced 1.4 and 1.2 log10 CFU mL−1.
Conclusion
Ozonized saline solution has antibiofilm activity, with better effect when applied for 1 minute at 80 μg/NmL, being a promising candidate therapy for the treatment of peri‐implant diseases.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果