Fast polymerization of isobutylene (IB) initiated by tert‐butyl chloride using ethylaluminum dichloride·bis(2‐chloroethyl) ether complex (T. Rajasekhar, J. Emert, R. Faust, Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 2852) was drastically slowed down in the presence of impurities, such as propionic acid, acetone, methanol, and acetonitrile. The effect of impurities on the polymerization rate was neutralized by using two different approaches. First, addition of a small amount of iron trichloride (FeCl₃) scavenged the impurity and formed an insoluble ·impurity complex in hexanes. The polymerization rate and exo‐olefin content were virtually identical to that obtained in the absence of impurities. Heterogeneous phase scavenger (FeCl₃) exhibited better performance than homogenous phase scavengers. In the second approach, conducting the polymerization in wet hexanes, the fast polymerization of IB was retained in the presence of impurities with a slight decrease in exo‐olefin content. ¹H NMR studies suggest that nucleophilic impurities are protonated in the presence of water, and thereby neutralized. Mechanistic studies suggest that the rate constant of activation (k_a), rate constant of propagation (k_p), and rate constant of β‐proton elimination (k_tr) are not affected by the presence of impurities. To account for the retardation of polymerization in the presence of impurities, delay of proton transfer to monomer in the chain transfer step is proposed. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 3697–3704