Comparison of H2 and He carbon cleaning mechanisms in extreme ultraviolet induced and surface wave discharge plasmas

A Dolgov, D Lopaev, T Rachimova… - Journal of Physics D …, 2014 - iopscience.iop.org
A Dolgov, D Lopaev, T Rachimova, A Kovalev, A Vasil'Eva, CJ Lee, VM Krivtsun
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2014iopscience.iop.org
Cleaning of contamination of optical surfaces by amorphous carbon (aC) is highly relevant
for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. We have studied the mechanisms for aC removal
from a Si surface. By comparing aC removal in a surface wave discharge (SWD) plasma and
an EUV-induced plasma, the cleaning mechanisms for hydrogen and helium gas
environments were determined. The C-atom removal per incident ion was estimated for
different sample bias voltages and ion fluxes. It was found that H 2 plasmas generally had …
Abstract
Cleaning of contamination of optical surfaces by amorphous carbon (aC) is highly relevant for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. We have studied the mechanisms for aC removal from a Si surface. By comparing aC removal in a surface wave discharge (SWD) plasma and an EUV-induced plasma, the cleaning mechanisms for hydrogen and helium gas environments were determined. The C-atom removal per incident ion was estimated for different sample bias voltages and ion fluxes. It was found that H 2 plasmas generally had higher cleaning rates than He plasmas: up to seven times higher for more negatively biased samples in EUV-induced plasma. Moreover, for H 2, EUV-induced plasma was found to be 2–3 times more efficient at removing carbon than the SWD plasma. It was observed that carbon removal during exposure to He is due to physical sputtering by He+ ions. In H 2, on the other hand, the increase in carbon removal rates is due to chemical sputtering. This is a new C cleaning mechanism for EUV-induced plasma, which we call'EUV-reactive ion sputtering'.
iopscience.iop.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果