[PDF][PDF] Comparison of LRFD and ASD for Pre-Fabricated Gable Frame Design

N Katanbafnezhad, AS Hoback - American Journal of Engineering …, 2020 - researchgate.net
American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 2020researchgate.net
Pre-fabricated gable frames with tapered members of varying angles were designed for six
locations using both Allowable Stress Design (ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor
Design (LRFD). The locations were chosen to represent a range of local loading conditions
as found in ASCE's Minimum Design Loads. Roof angles varied from 10 to 45 degrees and
spans varied from 20 to 200 feet. The results demonstrate significant differences in the
economies of ASD and LRFD. Each design basis had scenarios from one location to the …
Abstract
Pre-fabricated gable frames with tapered members of varying angles were designed for six locations using both Allowable Stress Design (ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). The locations were chosen to represent a range of local loading conditions as found in ASCE’s Minimum Design Loads. Roof angles varied from 10 to 45 degrees and spans varied from 20 to 200 feet. The results demonstrate significant differences in the economies of ASD and LRFD. Each design basis had scenarios from one location to the next where it was more economical. The biggest differences were for steep roofs in areas with high wind. The differences were up to 30% with LRFD generally being favored. The biggest variations were LRFD gave up to 30% less stress in some situations, and ASD gave 10% less in others.
researchgate.net
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果