Comparison of co-housing and littermate methods for microbiota standardization in mouse models

SJ Robertson, P Lemire, H Maughan, A Goethel… - Cell reports, 2019 - cell.com
SJ Robertson, P Lemire, H Maughan, A Goethel, W Turpin, L Bedrani, DS Guttman
Cell reports, 2019cell.com
The intestinal microbiota is a fundamental factor that broadly influences physiology. Thus,
studies using transgenic animals should be designed to limit the confounding effects of
microbiota variation between strains. Here, we report the impact on intestinal microbiota of
co-housed versus F2-generation littermates, two commonly used techniques to standardize
microbiota in animal models. Our results establish that while fecal microbiota is partially
normalized by extended co-housing, mucosal communities associated with the proximal …
Summary
The intestinal microbiota is a fundamental factor that broadly influences physiology. Thus, studies using transgenic animals should be designed to limit the confounding effects of microbiota variation between strains. Here, we report the impact on intestinal microbiota of co-housed versus F2-generation littermates, two commonly used techniques to standardize microbiota in animal models. Our results establish that while fecal microbiota is partially normalized by extended co-housing, mucosal communities associated with the proximal colon and terminal ileum remain stable and distinct. In contrast, strain inter-crossing to generate F2 littermates allows robust microbiota standardization in fecal, colon, and ileum sampling locations. Using reciprocal inter-crosses of P1 parents, we identify dissymmetry in F2 community structures caused by maternal transmission, in particular of the Verrucomicrobiaceae. Thus, F2 littermate animals from a unidirectional P1 cross should be used as a standard method to minimize the influence of the microbiota in genotype-phenotype studies.
cell.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果