Comparison of osseointegration of five different surfaced titanium implants

S Dundar, F Yaman, A Bozoglan… - Journal of …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
S Dundar, F Yaman, A Bozoglan, TT Yildirim, M Kirtay, MF Ozupek, G Artas
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2018journals.lww.com
The topography, chemical features, surface charge, and hydrophilic nature of titanium
implant surfaces are crucial factors for successful osseointegration. This study aimed to
investigate the bone implant contact (BIC) ratio of titanium dental implants with different
surface modification techniques using the rat femoral bone model. Sandblasted and acid
washed (SL-AW), sandblasted (SL), resorbable blast material (RBM), microarc (MA), and
sandblasted and microarc (SL-MA) surfaces were compared in this study. Forty male …
Abstract
The topography, chemical features, surface charge, and hydrophilic nature of titanium implant surfaces are crucial factors for successful osseointegration. This study aimed to investigate the bone implant contact (BIC) ratio of titanium dental implants with different surface modification techniques using the rat femoral bone model. Sandblasted and acid washed (SL-AW), sandblasted (SL), resorbable blast material (RBM), microarc (MA), and sandblasted and microarc (SL-MA) surfaces were compared in this study. Forty male Sprague–Dawley rats were used in this study. The rats were divided into 5 equal groups (n= 8), and totally 40 implants were integrated into the right femoral bones of the rats. The rats were sacrificed 12 weeks after the surgical integration of the implants. The implant surface–bone tissue interaction was directly observed by a light microscope, and BIC ratios were measured after the nondecalcified histological procedures. Bone implant contact ratios were determined as follows: SL-AW: 59.26±14.36%, SL: 66.01±9.63%, RBM: 63.53±11.23%, MA: 65.51±10.3%, and SL-MA: 68.62±6.6%. No statistically significant differences were found among the 5 different surfaced titanium implant groups (P> 0.05). Our results show that various implant surface modification techniques can provide favorable bone responses to the BIC of dental implants.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References