representatives of U. pinnato-ramosa [U. pumila var. arborea] and U. minor. Large
differences were observed in the response of genotypes to in vitro cultivation in all
experiments. Contrasting responses of clone 494 originating from different sites observed in
culture initiation were not observed during multiplication. All clones (except 274 and 568)
were successfully regenerated. Isoenzyme markers were utilized for identification of elm …