Data and code: Global and regional ecological boundaries explain abrupt spatial discontinuities in avian frugivory interactions

LP Martins, DB Stouffer, PG Blendinger… - 2022 - digital.csic.es
LP Martins, DB Stouffer, PG Blendinger, K Böhning-Gaese, G Buitrón-Jurado, M Correia…
2022digital.csic.es
Species interactions can propagate disturbances across space via direct and indirect effects,
potentially connecting species at a global scale. However, ecological and biogeographic
boundaries may mitigate this spread by demarcating the limits of ecological networks. We
tested whether large-scale ecological boundaries (ecoregions and biomes) and human
disturbance gradients increase dissimilarity among plant-frugivore networks, while
accounting for background spatial and elevational gradients and differences in network …
Species interactions can propagate disturbances across space via direct and indirect effects, potentially connecting species at a global scale. However, ecological and biogeographic boundaries may mitigate this spread by demarcating the limits of ecological networks. We tested whether large-scale ecological boundaries (ecoregions and biomes) and human disturbance gradients increase dissimilarity among plant-frugivore networks, while accounting for background spatial and elevational gradients and differences in network sampling. We assessed network dissimilarity patterns over a broad spatial scale, using 196 quantitative avian frugivory networks (encompassing 1,496 plant and 1,004 bird species) distributed across 67 ecoregions, 11 biomes, and 6 continents. We show that dissimilarities in species and interaction composition, but not network structure, are greater across ecoregion and biome boundaries and along different levels of human disturbance. Our findings indicate that biogeographic boundaries delineate the world’s biodiversity of interactions and likely contribute to mitigating the propagation of disturbances at large spatial scales.
digital.csic.es
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果