Dealing with consumer default: Bankruptcy vs garnishment

S Chatterjee, G Gordon - Journal of Monetary Economics, 2012 - Elsevier
Journal of Monetary Economics, 2012Elsevier
What are the positive and normative implications of eliminating bankruptcy protection for
indebted individuals? Without bankruptcy protection, creditors can collect on defaulted debt
to the extent permitted by wage garnishment laws. The elimination lowers the default
premium on unsecured debt and permits low-net-worth individuals suffering bad earnings
shocks to smooth consumption by borrowing. There is a large increase in consumer debt
financed essentially by super-wealthy individuals, a modest drop in capital per worker, and a …
What are the positive and normative implications of eliminating bankruptcy protection for indebted individuals? Without bankruptcy protection, creditors can collect on defaulted debt to the extent permitted by wage garnishment laws. The elimination lowers the default premium on unsecured debt and permits low-net-worth individuals suffering bad earnings shocks to smooth consumption by borrowing. There is a large increase in consumer debt financed essentially by super-wealthy individuals, a modest drop in capital per worker, and a higher frequency of consumer default. Average welfare rises by 1% of consumption in perpetuity, with about 90% of households favoring the change.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果