Electron backscatter diffraction of grain and subgrain structures—resolution considerations

FJ Humphreys, Y Huang, I Brough… - Journal of …, 1999 - Wiley Online Library
FJ Humphreys, Y Huang, I Brough, C Harris
Journal of Microscopy, 1999Wiley Online Library
Characterization of microstructures containing small grains or low‐angle grain boundaries
by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) is limited by the spatial and angular resolution
limits of the technique. It was found that the best effective spatial resolution (60 nm) for
aluminium alloys in a tungsten‐filament scanning electron microscope (SEM) was obtained
for an intermediate probe current which provided a compromise between pattern quality and
specimen interaction volume. The same specimens and EBSD equipment when used with a …
Characterization of microstructures containing small grains or low‐angle grain boundaries by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) is limited by the spatial and angular resolution limits of the technique. It was found that the best effective spatial resolution (60 nm) for aluminium alloys in a tungsten‐filament scanning electron microscope (SEM) was obtained for an intermediate probe current which provided a compromise between pattern quality and specimen interaction volume. The same specimens and EBSD equipment when used with a field‐emission gun SEM showed an improvement in spatial resolution by a factor of 2–3. For characterizing low‐angle boundary microstructures, the precision of determining relative orientations is a limiting factor. It was found that the orientation noise was directly related to the probe current and this was interpreted in terms of the effect of probe current on the quality of the diffraction patterns.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果