Enlivening political science courses with Kolb's learning preference model

KL Brock, BJ Cameron - PS: Political Science & Politics, 1999 - cambridge.org
KL Brock, BJ Cameron
PS: Political Science & Politics, 1999cambridge.org
Most political science professors hope their courses will produce graduates with well-
developed critical-thinking and problem-solving abilities, but many report frustration at not
being able to meet this goal with all, or even most, of their undergraduate students. Among
the many possible reasons for this frustration is a mismatch between the professor's learning
preferences, which may determine his or her teaching style, and the students' learning
preferences, which may affect their level of comprehension of material covered in the …
Most political science professors hope their courses will produce graduates with well-developed critical-thinking and problem-solving abilities, but many report frustration at not being able to meet this goal with all, or even most, of their undergraduate students. Among the many possible reasons for this frustration is a mismatch between the professor's learning preferences, which may determine his or her teaching style, and the students' learning preferences, which may affect their level of comprehension of material covered in the course. Learning preference mismatches may cause students to perform below their potential, earn political science the reputation of being a difficult, or worse, arbitrary subject, and reduce the professor's enthusiasm for teaching. Once these mismatches are identified and understood, they can be easily counteracted, usually without substantial course reorganization. Individuals process information, learn concepts, and solve problems in different ways. An individual's learning preference is" a personally preferred way of dealing with information and experience that crosses content areas"(Kruzich, Friesen, and Van Soest 1986). There is no
Cambridge University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果