Diagnostic fracture injection testing (DFIT) is an invaluable tool for evaluating reservoir properties in unconventional formations. The test comprises injection of water over a short time, starting a fracture at the end of a well's horizontal section, followed by a long shut-in period. Analysis of the falloff data with the G-function plot reveals the fracture-closure pressure, and the fracture pseudolinear-flow period.

In most tests, wellhead-pressure (WHP) measurements are used because of cost considerations. A wellbore-heat-transfer model is used to allow conversion of WHP to bottomhole pressure (BHP) by accounting for changing fluid density and compressibility along the wellbore. This model, in turn, allowed us to assess the quality of solutions generated with the WHP data. For DFIT analysis, we adapted the modified-Hall plot for the injection period, whereas both the pressure-derivative and G-function plots were used for the analysis of falloff data. The derivative signature of the modified-Hall plot allows unambiguous estimation of the fracture breakdown pressure (pf,) during the injection period. As expected, the pf, always turns out to be higher than the fracture-closure pressure (pf_c), estimated with the two methods during pressure falloff, thereby instilling confidence in the solutions obtained.

A statistical design of experiments with coupled geomechanical/fluid-flow simulation capabilities showed that the formation permeability is by far the most important variable controlling the fracture-closure time. Mechanical rock properties, such as Young's modulus of elasticity and the Poisson's ratio, play minor roles. In microdarcy formations, a longitudinal fracture takes much longer to close than a transverse fracture.