Fast direct melting of brackish sea-ice samples results in biologically more accurate results than slow buffered melting

JM Rintala, J Piiparinen, J Blomster, M Majaneva… - Polar Biology, 2014 - Springer
JM Rintala, J Piiparinen, J Blomster, M Majaneva, S Müller, J Uusikivi, R Autio
Polar Biology, 2014Springer
Sea-ice samples intended for biological analyses, eg, chlorophyll-a, cell enumeration of
algae and protozoa and primary production, are affected by the sampling and sample
processing methods. In this study, we compared different sample processing methods by
melting Baltic Sea ice samples in different ways (direct melting, buffered melting in filtered
seawater (FSW) and buffered melting in artificial seawater at two different salinities with
added nutrients) at two temperatures [+ 4° C and room temperature (RT)]. We show that sea …
Abstract
Sea-ice samples intended for biological analyses, e.g., chlorophyll-a, cell enumeration of algae and protozoa and primary production, are affected by the sampling and sample processing methods. In this study, we compared different sample processing methods by melting Baltic Sea ice samples in different ways (direct melting, buffered melting in filtered seawater (FSW) and buffered melting in artificial seawater at two different salinities with added nutrients) at two temperatures [+4 °C and room temperature (RT)]. We show that sea-ice samples intended for most commonly used biological analyses can be melted without the addition of FSW. In particular, adding artificial seawater should be avoided. To minimize biological processes, such as growth, death, predation and pigment degradation, the melting should be done rapidly at RT preferably by gently shaking the sample to keep the melt cool.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果