Foam for gas mobility control in the Snorre field: the FAWAG project
T Blaker, MG Aarra, A Skauge, L Rasmussen… - … Reservoir Evaluation & …, 2002 - onepetro.org
T Blaker, MG Aarra, A Skauge, L Rasmussen, HK Celius, HA Martinsen, F Vassenden
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2002•onepetro.orgSummary The Foam Assisted Water Alternating Gas (FAWAG) project has been a full-scale
field demonstration of foam for gas mobility control. It was carried out in the Snorre field on
the Norwegian Continental Shelf from 1997 to 2000, with support from the European
Commission's Thermie Program. A production well treatment to reduce the producing gas/oil
ratio (GOR) was performed in 1996. The FAWAG was initiated in the Central Fault Block
(CFB) of the Snorre field in August 1998. A commercial surfactant system, AOS (α-olefin …
field demonstration of foam for gas mobility control. It was carried out in the Snorre field on
the Norwegian Continental Shelf from 1997 to 2000, with support from the European
Commission's Thermie Program. A production well treatment to reduce the producing gas/oil
ratio (GOR) was performed in 1996. The FAWAG was initiated in the Central Fault Block
(CFB) of the Snorre field in August 1998. A commercial surfactant system, AOS (α-olefin …
Summary
The Foam Assisted Water Alternating Gas (FAWAG) project has been a full-scale field demonstration of foam for gas mobility control. It was carried out in the Snorre field on the Norwegian Continental Shelf from 1997 to 2000, with support from the European Commission's Thermie Program.
A production well treatment to reduce the producing gas/oil ratio (GOR) was performed in 1996. The FAWAG was initiated in the Central Fault Block (CFB) of the Snorre field in August 1998. A commercial surfactant system, AOS (α-olefin-sulphonate), with a carbon chain length mix of C14/C16, was chosen as the foaming agent. Approximately 2000 tons of commercial grade AOS surfactant have been injected.
Foam for mobility control in the CFB operation had to be aborted because of operative problems in the target injector P-25A. The main operational conclusion from the CFB operations was that surfactant alternating gas (SAG) injection is preferable to coinjection. Operationally, SAG injection is almost identical to water alternating gas injection (WAG), which is a well-known production method.
The concluding demonstration was performed on the Western Fault Block (WFB) in well pair P32-P39. The target injector and producer wells are approximately 1500 m apart. A total of 380 tons of commercial grade surfactant was used. The surfactant was divided into two slugs, each followed by gas injection that lasted until original gas injectivity was restored.
The production from WFB has shown that large volumes of gas have been stored, either temporarily or permanently, in the reservoir. It has been estimated that the FAWAG treatment has contributed approximately 250 000 Sm3 of oil. The cost of the treatment in WFB was approximately U.S. $1 million.
onepetro.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果