articles. To what extent should educationists be arguing for the at least relative autonomy of the curriculum? Or should we accept that the curriculum is increasingly used as an instrument of wider political, social and economic purposes?
Underlying all these questions is a broader issue that is only addressed indirectly by these articles. To what extent should educationists be arguing for the at least relative autonomy of the curriculum? Or should we accept that the curriculum is increasingly used as an instrument of wider political, social and economic purposes?