Impact of surface porosity and topography on the mechanical behavior of high strength biomedical polymers

NT Evans, CW Irvin, DL Safranski, K Gall - Journal of the mechanical …, 2016 - Elsevier
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2016Elsevier
The ability to control the surface topography of orthopedic implant materials is desired to
improve osseointegration but is often at the expense of mechanical performance in load
bearing environments. Here we investigate the effects of surface modifications, roughness
and porosity, on the mechanical properties of a set of polymers with diverse chemistry and
structure. Both roughness and surface porosity resulted in samples with lower strength,
failure strain and fatigue life due to stress concentrations at the surface; however, the …
Abstract
The ability to control the surface topography of orthopedic implant materials is desired to improve osseointegration but is often at the expense of mechanical performance in load bearing environments. Here we investigate the effects of surface modifications, roughness and porosity, on the mechanical properties of a set of polymers with diverse chemistry and structure. Both roughness and surface porosity resulted in samples with lower strength, failure strain and fatigue life due to stress concentrations at the surface; however, the decrease in ductility and fatigue strength were greater than the decrease in monotonic strength. The fatigue properties of the injection molded polymers did not correlate with yield strength as would be traditionally observed in metals. Rather, the fatigue properties and the capacity to maintain properties with the introduction of surface porosity correlated with the fracture toughness of the polymers. Polymer structure impacted the materials relative capacity to maintain monotonic and cyclic properties in the face of surface texture and porosity. Generally, amorphous polymers with large ratios of upper to lower yield points demonstrated a more significant drop in ductility and fatigue strength with the introduction of porosity compared to crystalline polymers with smaller ratios in their upper to lower yield strength. The latter materials have more effective dissipation mechanisms to minimize the impact of surface porosity on both monotonic and cyclic damage.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References