Inducible protective processes in animal systems XIII: comparative analysis of induction of adaptive response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma cells

PV Mahadimane, V Vasudev - Scientifica, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
PV Mahadimane, V Vasudev
Scientifica, 2014Wiley Online Library
In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two
monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl
methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in
vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS
and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS
were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time …
In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果