Desorption hysteresis affects gas mass transfer and migration in coal seams, which is not considered in current dual-porosity medium models, leading to inaccurate assessment and prediction of gas extraction. This study proposed a desorption hysteresis pressure to address this issue of the gas mass transfer in the model. On this basis, two coupled gas migration models, considering (DGMH) and without considering (DGM) desorption hysteresis effects, were developed incorporating mass transfer, gas desorption, gas seepage, and permeability evolution. The models were solved and compared using the finite element method. The results demonstrate that the DGM model yields higher production assessment compared to the DGMH model. This discrepancy can be attributed to the hysteresis effects, which prevent the matrix gas from supplementing the fractures timely after fracture gas flows into the borehole. The DGMH model shows less mass transfer, coal seam permeability, and gas extraction compared to the DGM model. The desorption hysteresis effects are more pronounced in coal seams with higher permeability. In addition, neglecting hysteresis effects when calculating permeability from field gas production data may result in inaccurate values. The hysteresis effects is recommended to be considered in the prediction of coalbed methane extraction, permeability calculation, and risk control of delayed coal and gas outbursts.