Is RSSI a good choice for localization in wireless sensor network?

K Heurtefeux, F Valois - 2012 IEEE 26th international …, 2012 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
2012 IEEE 26th international conference on advanced information …, 2012ieeexplore.ieee.org
Numerous localization protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks are based on Received
Signal Strength Indicator. Because absolute positioning is not always available, localization
based on RSSI is popular. More, no extra hardware is needed unlike solutions based on
infra-red or ultrasonic. Moreover, the theory gives a RSSI as a function of distance. However,
using RSSI as a distance metric involves errors in the measured values, resulting path-loss,
fading, and shadowing effects. We present experimentation results from three large WSNs …
Numerous localization protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks are based on Received Signal Strength Indicator. Because absolute positioning is not always available, localization based on RSSI is popular. More, no extra hardware is needed unlike solutions based on infra-red or ultrasonic. Moreover, the theory gives a RSSI as a function of distance. However, using RSSI as a distance metric involves errors in the measured values, resulting path-loss, fading, and shadowing effects. We present experimentation results from three large WSNs, each with up to 250 nodes. Based on our findings from the 3 systems, the relation between RSSI and distance is investigated according to the topology properties and the radio environment. We underline the intrinsic limitations of RSSI as a distance metric, in terms of accuracy and stability. Contrary to what we assumed, collaborative localization protocol based on Spring-Relaxation algorithm can not smooth the distance-estimation errors obtained with RSSI measurements.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果