Long‐term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with a contralateral carotid artery occlusion

R Cotter, DG Kokkinidis, HH Choy… - Catheterization and …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
R Cotter, DG Kokkinidis, HH Choy, GD Singh, RK Rogers, SW Waldo, JR Laird…
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2019Wiley Online Library
Objectives To examine the association between a contralateral carotid artery occlusion
(CCO) and the rates of subsequent target‐lesion restenosis and revascularization after
carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background Patients with carotid artery disease undergoing
revascularization often have a CCO. The association of a CCO with long‐term outcomes
after CAS is uncertain. Methods At two institutions, 267 CAS procedures were performed
from 2006 to 2016 including 47 (18%) with a CCO. Regular follow‐up with duplex carotid …
Objectives
To examine the association between a contralateral carotid artery occlusion (CCO) and the rates of subsequent target‐lesion restenosis and revascularization after carotid artery stenting (CAS).
Background
Patients with carotid artery disease undergoing revascularization often have a CCO. The association of a CCO with long‐term outcomes after CAS is uncertain.
Methods
At two institutions, 267 CAS procedures were performed from 2006 to 2016 including 47 (18%) with a CCO. Regular follow‐up with duplex carotid ultrasound was performed to assess for restenosis. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the presence of a CCO and repeat revascularization.
Results
The mean patient age was 70 years. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in procedural indication (asymptomatic vs ischemic symptoms) or medical comorbidities between groups. During 5‐year follow up, the rate of duplex‐derived >80% stenosis was 6% in the non‐CCO group and 9% in the CCO group (P = 0.45). Despite similar rates of >80% restenosis, there was a significant association between CCO and subsequent target‐lesion revascularization (TLR), with rates of 6.4% vs 0.9% at 5 years (HR 7.2, confidence interval (CI) 1.2–43, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between groups in the 5‐year rates of stroke (4.3% in CCO group vs 4.5% in non‐CCO group, HR 0.53, CI 0.07–4.22, P = 1.0) or MACCE (15% vs 18%, HR 0.55, CI 0.2–1.55, P = 0.68).
Conclusions
Patients undergoing CAS with a CCO were more likely to undergo TLR during long‐term follow up, but they did not have any differences in procedural success or short‐ and long‐term outcomes.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果