Malicious insider threat detection using variation of sampling methods for anomaly detection in cloud environment

S Asha, D Shanmugapriya, G Padmavathi - Computers and Electrical …, 2023 - Elsevier
Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2023Elsevier
Abstract Machine learning (ML) techniques have currently been exploited for malicious
insider threat (MIT) detection. The data variation between malicious and genuine user
influences the ML model to misinterpret a malicious insider. Hence, the class imbalance
problem (CIP) remains a challenging one. Regardless of the CIP in MIT detection, past
research has a significant shortfall in deploying diverse sampling methods. ie,
undersampling and oversampling approach. This study proposed a novel double-layer …
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) techniques have currently been exploited for malicious insider threat (MIT) detection. The data variation between malicious and genuine user influences the ML model to misinterpret a malicious insider. Hence, the class imbalance problem (CIP) remains a challenging one. Regardless of the CIP in MIT detection, past research has a significant shortfall in deploying diverse sampling methods. i.e., undersampling and oversampling approach. This study proposed a novel double-layer architecture for MIT detection. The initial layer involves integration, transformation, and sampling system of data. In the sampling system, an efficient sampling approach is adopted to depreciate CIP among eight sampling techniques, depending on the performance of support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Nearmiss2 (NM-2) excels and is considered an optimal sampling technique. In the second layer, sampled data of NM-2 is employed in an anomalous MIT detection model using various anomaly detection techniques and evaluated with performance metrics. The main focus is to validate the solution for CIP in anomaly detection techniques with previous research. The proposed double-layer architecture with NM-2 and One-class SVM obtained recall and f-score of 100% and 78.72%. In contrast, it exhibits an accuracy of 82.46%, with a reasonable detection rate for MIT detection
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果