[PDF][PDF] Packetization schemes for forward error correction in internet video streaming

F Zhai, Y Eisenberg, CE Luna, TN Pappas… - PROCEEDINGS OF THE …, 2003 - Citeseer
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND …, 2003Citeseer
In this work, our focus is on video streaming applications with relatively strict delay
constraints; for such applications, forward error correction (FEC) is the preferred channel
coding technique to recover from packet losses. Moreover, since video packets are usually
of different importance, optimal bit allocation across video packets results in different packets
receiving unequal error protection (UEP). For Internet video, cross-packet FEC in addition to
source packets can be performed by generating parity packets [1]. Alternatively, a source …
In this work, our focus is on video streaming applications with relatively strict delay constraints; for such applications, forward error correction (FEC) is the preferred channel coding technique to recover from packet losses. Moreover, since video packets are usually of different importance, optimal bit allocation across video packets results in different packets receiving unequal error protection (UEP). For Internet video, cross-packet FEC in addition to source packets can be performed by generating parity packets [1]. Alternatively, a source packet can be partitioned into different transport packets to achieve prioritized protection, which has been studied for scalable video in [2]. In this paper, we compare the performance of these two packetization schemes applied to single-layer video. The comparison is carried out in a joint source-channel coding (JSCC) framework, where error resilient source coding and FEC are jointly designed. We show that either packetization scheme may be optimal depending on the packet loss rate.
Citeseer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果