Uruguay shows a contradiction. The values found for the attitudinal dimensions of malaise in representation are low and, in this sense, malaise in representation is weak. On the other hand, however, the behavioral dimensions of malaise have high values compared to Chile and Argentina. We argue that this contradiction is only apparent. Between 1985 and 2014, some particularities of the Uruguayan political system and its institutional framework operated virtuously, channeling social demands institutionally. This resulted in a system of representation in which social protests (the behavioral dimensions of malaise) acted as a way of integrating citizens into the political system, rather than being a symptom of problems of representation. As a consequence, the attitudinal dimensions of malaise have been historically low in this country.