Prognosis of diffuse axonal injury with traumatic brain injury

SS Humble, LD Wilson, L Wang, DA Long… - Journal of Trauma …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
SS Humble, LD Wilson, L Wang, DA Long, MA Smith, JC Siktberg, MF Mirhoseini, A Bhatia
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2018journals.lww.com
BACKGROUND Determine the prognostic impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-
defined diffuse axonal injury (DAI) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) on functional outcomes,
quality of life, and 3-year mortality. METHODS This retrospective single center cohort
included adult trauma patients (age> 17 years) admitted from 2006 to 2012 with TBI.
Inclusion criteria were positive head computed tomography with brain MRI within 2 weeks of
admission. Exclusion criteria included penetrating TBI or prior neurologic condition …
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Determine the prognostic impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined diffuse axonal injury (DAI) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) on functional outcomes, quality of life, and 3-year mortality.
METHODS
This retrospective single center cohort included adult trauma patients (age> 17 years) admitted from 2006 to 2012 with TBI. Inclusion criteria were positive head computed tomography with brain MRI within 2 weeks of admission. Exclusion criteria included penetrating TBI or prior neurologic condition. Separate ordinal logistic models assessed DAI's prognostic value for the following scores:(1) hospital-discharge Functional Independence Measure,(2) long-term Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and (3) long-term Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed DAI's prognostic value for 3-year survival. Covariates included age, sex, race, insurance status, Injury Severity Score, admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, Marshall Head computed tomography Class, clinical DAI on MRI (Y/N), research-level anatomic DAI Grades I-III (I, cortical; II, corpus callosum; III, brainstem), ventilator days, time to follow commands, and time to long-term follow-up (for logistic models).
RESULTS
Eligibility criteria was met by 311 patients, who had a median age of 40 years (interquartile range [IQR], 23–57 years), Injury Severity Score of 29 (IQR, 22–38), intensive care unit stay of 6 days (IQR, 2–11 days), and follow-up of 5 years (IQR, 3–6 years). Clinical DAI was present on 47% of MRIs. Among 300 readable MRIs, 56% of MRIs had anatomic DAI (25% Grade I, 18% Grade II, 13% Grade III). On regression, only clinical (not anatomic) DAI was predictive of a lower Functional Independence Measure score (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.28–4.76], p= 0.007). Neither clinical nor anatomic DAI were related to survival, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, or Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale scores.
CONCLUSION
In this longitudinal cohort, clinical evidence of DAI on MRI may only be useful for predicting short-term in-hospital functional outcome. Given no association of DAI and long-term TBI outcomes, providers should be cautious in attributing DAI to future neurologic function, quality of life, and/or survival.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果