Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects

JR de Almeida, RCW Park, NL Villanueva… - Head & …, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
Head & neck, 2014Wiley Online Library
Background Transoral techniques for oropharyngeal tumors, such as transoral robotic
surgery (TORS) and transoral laser microsurgery, require new reconstructive considerations.
Methods Defects from 92 patients undergoing TORS were classified into 4 classes. A
reconstruction algorithm was followed. Perioperative outcomes and complications were
assessed. Forty‐seven patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)
swallowing questionnaire and a modified Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Quality of Life …
Background
Transoral techniques for oropharyngeal tumors, such as transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and transoral laser microsurgery, require new reconstructive considerations.
Methods
Defects from 92 patients undergoing TORS were classified into 4 classes. A reconstruction algorithm was followed. Perioperative outcomes and complications were assessed. Forty‐seven patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) swallowing questionnaire and a modified Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Quality of Life (VPIQL) questionnaire postoperatively.
Results
The most common reconstructions involved velopharyngoplasties with local flaps (39%), local flaps alone (25%), or secondary healing (20%). More advanced defects (class III and IV defects) required regional and free flaps more often. No significant differences were found in MDADI scores or VPIQL scores among the 4 defect classes. Only adjuvant radiotherapy was a predictor of poor swallowing (p = .02).
Conclusion
The classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects maps defects into 4 classes and guides the reconstructive thought process. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 934–941, 2014
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果