Reflection machines: increasing meaningful human control over Decision Support Systems

NAJ Cornelissen, RJM van Eerdt… - Ethics and Information …, 2022 - Springer
NAJ Cornelissen, RJM van Eerdt, HK Schraffenberger, WFG Haselager
Ethics and Information Technology, 2022Springer
Abstract Rapid developments in Artificial Intelligence are leading to an increasing human
reliance on machine decision making. Even in collaborative efforts with Decision Support
Systems (DSSs), where a human expert is expected to make the final decisions, it can be
hard to keep the expert actively involved throughout the decision process. DSSs suggest
their own solutions and thus invite passive decision making. To keep humans actively 'on'the
decision-making loop and counter overreliance on machines, we propose a 'reflection …
Abstract
Rapid developments in Artificial Intelligence are leading to an increasing human reliance on machine decision making. Even in collaborative efforts with Decision Support Systems (DSSs), where a human expert is expected to make the final decisions, it can be hard to keep the expert actively involved throughout the decision process. DSSs suggest their own solutions and thus invite passive decision making. To keep humans actively ‘on’ the decision-making loop and counter overreliance on machines, we propose a ‘reflection machine’ (RM). This system asks users questions about their decision strategy and thereby prompts them to evaluate their own decisions critically. We discuss what forms RMs can take and present a proof-of-concept implementation of a RM that can produce feedback on users’ decisions in the medical and law domains. We show that the prototype requires very little domain knowledge to create reasonably intelligent critiquing questions. With this prototype, we demonstrate the technical feasibility to develop RMs and hope to pave the way for future research into their effectiveness and value.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

Google学术搜索按钮

example.edu/paper.pdf
搜索
获取 PDF 文件
引用
References