Regional power in national diplomacy: The case of the US section of the international boundary and water commission

SP Mumme - Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1984 - academic.oup.com
Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1984academic.oup.com
An interesting anomaly in the usual pattern of federal foreign policy management is found in
the case of the US Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United
States and Mexico. The US Section functions as a quasi-independent agency formally
subject to the US Department of State for policy oversight. Since its formation in 1945,
however, the US Section has acquired substantial institutional autonomy from the State
Department due to its specialized jurisdiction, clientele relations with US border states, and …
Abstract
An interesting anomaly in the usual pattern of federal foreign policy management is found in the case of the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico. The U.S. Section functions as a quasi-independent agency formally subject to the U.S. Department of State for policy oversight. Since its formation in 1945, however, the U.S. Section has acquired substantial institutional autonomy from the State Department due to its specialized jurisdiction, clientele relations with U.S. border states, and bilateral diplomacy. The U.S. Section performs a mediator role between the State Department and its state clientele in resolving transboundary problems with Mexico, and leans toward the states when federal and state interests conflict.
Oxford University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果