Romance genitives: Agreement, definiteness, and phases

A Massaro - Transactions of the Philological Society, 2022 - Wiley Online Library
Transactions of the Philological Society, 2022Wiley Online Library
In this paper, which discusses data from Gargano Apulian Italo‐Romance, I propose that
prepositional and non‐prepositional genitives are fundamentally two different types of
phrases, and that the interpretation of a non‐prepositional noun as the possessor is not due
to a silent preposition or head‐modifier inversion, but rather to an agreement mechanism
taking place between the modifier and its head. We propose that, just as a genitive can
agree with its head for gender and number features so it can for definiteness, and that …
Abstract
In this paper, which discusses data from Gargano Apulian Italo‐Romance, I propose that prepositional and non‐prepositional genitives are fundamentally two different types of phrases, and that the interpretation of a non‐prepositional noun as the possessor is not due to a silent preposition or head‐modifier inversion, but rather to an agreement mechanism taking place between the modifier and its head. We propose that, just as a genitive can agree with its head for gender and number features so it can for definiteness, and that agreement for definiteness yields a genitival interpretation of the non‐prepositional noun. I.e., definiteness can externalize the syntactic relation between head and modifier. We also propose that in this Apulian variety, non‐prepositional genitives are syntactic phases (Chomsky 2001), and that the same holds for non‐prepositional ‘qualitative’ predicative phrases in the same language. This would explain the impossibility of accessing the phrase through syntactic operations such as extraction.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果