Sensitivity and specificity of linear array intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery: a comparative study with high field intraoperative MRI and conventional …

J Coburger, A Scheuerle, T Kapapa, J Engelke… - Neurosurgical …, 2015 - Springer
J Coburger, A Scheuerle, T Kapapa, J Engelke, DR Thal, CR Wirtz, R König
Neurosurgical review, 2015Springer
Introduction Linear array intraoperative ultrasound (lioUS) is an emerging technology for
intracranial use. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of lioUS to detect residual tumor in
patients harboring a glioblastoma. Methods After near total resection in 20 patients, residual
tumor detection using lioUS, conventional intraoperative ultrasound (cioUS), and
gadopentetic-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced intraoperative MRI
(iMRI) were compared. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on 68 navigated …
Introduction
Linear array intraoperative ultrasound (lioUS) is an emerging technology for intracranial use. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of lioUS to detect residual tumor in patients harboring a glioblastoma.
Methods
After near total resection in 20 patients, residual tumor detection using lioUS, conventional intraoperative ultrasound (cioUS), and gadopentetic-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced intraoperative MRI (iMRI) were compared. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on 68 navigated biopsies. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and correlation with histopathological findings of each imaging modality were calculated. Additionally, results were evaluated in the subgroup of recurrent disease (23 biopsies in 8 patients).
Results
Sensitivity of lioUS (76 %) was significantly higher compared with iMRI (55 %) and cioUS (24 %). Specificity of lioUS (58 %) was significantly lower than in cioUS (96 %), while there was no significant difference to iMRI (74 %). All imaging modalities correlated significantly with histopathological findings. In the subgroup of recurrent disease, sensitivity and specificity decreased in all modalities. However, cioUS showed significant lower values than iMRI and lioUS. In ROC curves, lioUS showed a higher area und the curve (AUC) in comparison with iMRI and cioUS. We found similar results in the subgroup of recurrent disease.
Conclusion
Tumor detection using a lioUS is significantly superior to cioUS. Overall test performance in lioUS is comparable with results of iMRI. While, the latter has a higher specificity and a significantly lower sensitivity in comparison with lioUS.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果