Size nouns in Romanian. Gliding along the quantifying–evaluating continuum

M Tănase-Dogaru - Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov …, 2022 - ceeol.com
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology …, 2022ceeol.com
The paper looks at size nouns of the type grămadă 'heap/pile'in Romanian and classifies
them into two categories: size nouns with a comparative interpretation (Doetjes and Rooryck
2003) and size nouns with a quantifying interpretation (Brems 2007; 2010), the latter reading
being sometimes contextually extended to a third type of interpretation, the negative
evaluation interpretation (Brems 2010). The two major types of readings that size nouns may
have are read off a head-complement syntactic structure, typical for pseudopartitive …
The paper looks at size nouns of the type grămadă ‘heap / pile’ in Romanian and classifies them into two categories: size nouns with a comparative interpretation (Doetjes and Rooryck 2003) and size nouns with a quantifying interpretation (Brems 2007; 2010), the latter reading being sometimes contextually extended to a third type of interpretation, the negative evaluation interpretation (Brems 2010). The two major types of readings that size nouns may have are read off a head-complement syntactic structure, typical for pseudopartitive constructions, which size nouns+de+N constitute a subcategory of (Tănase-Dogaru 2017). The comparative interpretation arises as a reflex of the semi-lexicality of the size noun, while the quantifying interpretation is a reflex of the size noun having lost its original lexical meaning, and therefore serving a functional role.
Central and Eastern European Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果