This article analyses the developing approach of the European Court of Human Rights to the
indication of specific non-monetary individual or general remedies and the impact of this
practice on the execution of its judgments. It draws on interviews with Judges of the Court
and officials in Council of Europe institutions, and a statistical analysis of pilot judgments
and judgments that invoke Article 46 of the European Convention of Human Rights
delivered between 2004 and 2016. The article argues that the Court's remedial practice is …