The importance of modeling the human cerebral vasculature in blunt trauma

DR Subramaniam, G Unnikrishnan… - Biomedical engineering …, 2021 - Springer
DR Subramaniam, G Unnikrishnan, A Sundaramurthy, JE Rubio, VB Kote, J Reifman
Biomedical engineering online, 2021Springer
Background Multiple studies describing human head finite element (FE) models have
established the importance of including the major cerebral vasculature to improve the
accuracy of the model predictions. However, a more detailed network of cerebral
vasculature, including the major veins and arteries as well as their branch vessels, can
further enhance the model-predicted biomechanical responses and help identify correlates
to observed blunt-induced brain injury. Methods We used an anatomically accurate three …
Background
Multiple studies describing human head finite element (FE) models have established the importance of including the major cerebral vasculature to improve the accuracy of the model predictions. However, a more detailed network of cerebral vasculature, including the major veins and arteries as well as their branch vessels, can further enhance the model-predicted biomechanical responses and help identify correlates to observed blunt-induced brain injury.
Methods
We used an anatomically accurate three-dimensional geometry of a 50th percentile U.S. male head that included the skin, eyes, sinuses, spine, skull, brain, meninges, and a detailed network of cerebral vasculature to develop a high-fidelity model. We performed blunt trauma simulations and determined the intracranial pressure (ICP), the relative displacement (RD), the von Mises stress, and the maximum principal strain. We validated our detailed-vasculature model by comparing the model-predicted ICP and RD values with experimental measurements. To quantify the influence of including a more comprehensive network of brain vessels, we compared the biomechanical responses of our detailed-vasculature model with those of a reduced-vasculature model and a no-vasculature model.
Results
For an inclined frontal impact, the predicted ICP matched well with the experimental results in the fossa, frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes, with peak-pressure differences ranging from 2.4% to 9.4%. For a normal frontal impact, the predicted ICP matched the experimental results in the frontal lobe and lateral ventricle, with peak-pressure discrepancies equivalent to 1.9% and 22.3%, respectively. For an offset parietal impact, the model-predicted RD matched well with the experimental measurements, with peak RD differences of 27% and 24% in the right and left cerebral hemispheres, respectively. Incorporating the detailed cerebral vasculature did not influence the ICP but redistributed the brain-tissue stresses and strains by as much as 30%. In addition, our detailed-vasculature model predicted strain reductions by as much as 28% when compared to current reduced-vasculature FE models that only include the major cerebral vessels.
Conclusions
Our study highlights the importance of including a detailed representation of the cerebral vasculature in FE models to more accurately estimate the biomechanical responses of the human brain to blunt impact.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果