The learning effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation teaching among Chinese nursing students: A mixed-methods study

LI Zhen, FF Huang, C Shiah-Lian, W Anni… - Journal of Nursing …, 2021 - journals.lww.com
LI Zhen, FF Huang, C Shiah-Lian, W Anni, GUO Yufang
Journal of Nursing Research, 2021journals.lww.com
Background High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is an interactive and complex experiential
learning pedagogy. Given the limited and inconclusive evidence on the effectiveness of HFS
in terms of improving student learning outcomes, a more thorough understanding of
students' learning experiences and effects of HFS may inform the improvement of nursing
training. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the learning effectiveness score of
HFS, its influencing factors, and the learning experience of nursing students. Methods A …
Abstract
Background
High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is an interactive and complex experiential learning pedagogy. Given the limited and inconclusive evidence on the effectiveness of HFS in terms of improving student learning outcomes, a more thorough understanding of students' learning experiences and effects of HFS may inform the improvement of nursing training.
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the learning effectiveness score of HFS, its influencing factors, and the learning experience of nursing students.
Methods
A convergent parallel mixed-methods research design was adopted. Five hundred thirty-three third-year undergraduate nursing students completed the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory. Semistructured interviews were used to elicit the opinions of 22 participants regarding their participation in the HFS experience.
Results
The quantitative findings showed a moderately high learning effectiveness of HFS among Chinese undergraduate nursing students (121.81±14.93). The learning effectiveness for equipment resources (15.02±2.38), course arrangement (11.18±1.73), and confidence (18.56±3.67) was relatively low. Extroversion and mixed personality (β= 0.14 and 0.10) and “dislike” or “general like” of the course (β=− 0.45 and− 0.33) were found to influence learning effectiveness (F= 54.79, p<. 001, adjusted R 2=. 29). In addition, the qualitative findings indicated that the participants felt positively regarding the “debriefing,”“clinical abilities,” and “problem solving” dimensions of the training.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果