Transparency in hip fracture recovery over institutional boundaries: The transmural monitoring pathway

WS Nijmeijer, D van Dartel, R de Groot… - Clinical …, 2023 - journals.sagepub.com
WS Nijmeijer, D van Dartel, R de Groot, S Woudsma, EC Folbert, N den Braber, M Vermeer…
Clinical rehabilitation, 2023journals.sagepub.com
Objectives To develop a transmural pathway for healthcare professionals across institutions
to monitor the recovery of hip fracture patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate
the pathway's feasibility and initial outcomes. Design Prospective cohort study. Method
Stakeholders of the hospital and geriatric rehabilitation institutions implemented a
transmural monitoring pathway in which different geriatric health domains were monitored
during three phases: The in-hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, and outpatient follow-up phase …
Objectives
To develop a transmural pathway for healthcare professionals across institutions to monitor the recovery of hip fracture patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the pathway's feasibility and initial outcomes.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Method
Stakeholders of the hospital and geriatric rehabilitation institutions implemented a transmural monitoring pathway in which different geriatric health domains were monitored during three phases: The in-hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, and outpatient follow-up phase. The outcomes for the first 291 patients and the feasibility of the pathway were evaluated. If the outcomes of the clinimetrics significantly improved over time, progress in functional recovery was assumed. Feasibility was assessed according to the rate of adherence to the clinimetric tests.
Results
During the in-hospital phase, patients showed a decline in functional level (the Katz index of independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL) pre-fracture vs. discharge: 0 (0–2) vs. 4 (4–5), P < 0.001). Patients, in which 78.6% (n = 140) had cognitive impairment and 41.2% had malnutrition, showed the most progress (Katz-ADL 2 (1–3)) during the inpatient rehabilitation phase. In the outpatient follow-up phase, recovery remained ongoing, but most patients had not returned to their pre-fracture functional levels (Katz-ADL 1 (1–3)). The pathway feasibility during the first phase was excellent (>85%), whereas room for improvement existed during other phases (<85%).
Conclusion
The transmural monitoring pathway provides insight into the entire recovery process for all involved healthcare professionals. Patients showed the most progress during the rehabilitation phase. The pathway feasibility was excellent during the in-hospital phase, but improvements could be made during other phases.
Sage Journals
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果