Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer “unfit” for cisplatin-based chemotherapy

MD Galsky, NM Hahn, J Rosenberg… - Journal of clinical …, 2011 - ascopubs.org
MD Galsky, NM Hahn, J Rosenberg, G Sonpavde, T Hutson, WK Oh, R Dreicer…
Journal of clinical oncology, 2011ascopubs.org
Purpose Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line
treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of
patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered “unfit” for cisplatin. The purpose
of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of
patients. Patients and Methods In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are
explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens …
Purpose
Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered “unfit” for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of patients.
Patients and Methods
In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens in unfit patients are summarized.
Results
Several phase II trials and a single, large phase III trial have explored chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of unfit patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Heterogeneous eligibility criteria have been used to define unfit patients in these studies. A uniform definition of unfit is proposed on the basis of the results of a survey of genitourinary medical oncologists. According to this definition, unfit patients would meet at least one of the following criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min, grade ≥ 2 hearing loss, grade ≥ 2 neuropathy, and/or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure.
Conclusion
Additional studies to optimize treatment for this important subset of patients are needed. A uniform definition of unfit patients will lead to more uniform clinical trials, enhanced ability to interpret the results of these trials, and a greater likelihood of developing a viable strategy for regulatory approval.
ASCO Publications
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果