Validity and comparability of a wrist-worn accelerometer in children
Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2012•journals.humankinetics.com
Background: Wrist-worn accelerometers may provide an alternative to hip-worn monitors for
assessing physical activity as they are easier to wear and may thus facilitate long-term
recordings. The current study aimed at a) assessing the validity of the Actiwatch (wrist-worn)
for estimating energy expenditure, b) determining cut-off values for light, moderate, and
vigorous activities, c) studying the comparability between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph
(hip-worn), and d) assessing reliability. Methods: For validity, indirect calorimetry was used …
assessing physical activity as they are easier to wear and may thus facilitate long-term
recordings. The current study aimed at a) assessing the validity of the Actiwatch (wrist-worn)
for estimating energy expenditure, b) determining cut-off values for light, moderate, and
vigorous activities, c) studying the comparability between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph
(hip-worn), and d) assessing reliability. Methods: For validity, indirect calorimetry was used …
Background
Wrist-worn accelerometers may provide an alternative to hip-worn monitors for assessing physical activity as they are easier to wear and may thus facilitate long-term recordings. The current study aimed at a) assessing the validity of the Actiwatch (wrist-worn) for estimating energy expenditure, b) determining cut-off values for light, moderate, and vigorous activities, c) studying the comparability between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph (hip-worn), and d) assessing reliability.
Methods
For validity, indirect calorimetry was used as criterion measure. ROC-analyses were applied to identify cut-off values. Comparability was tested by simultaneously wearing of the 2 accelerometers during free-living condition. Reliability was tested in a mechanical shaker.
Results
All-over correlation between accelerometer output and energy expenditure were found to be 0.80 ( P < .001).Based on ROC-analysis, cut-off values for 1.5, 3, and 6 METs were found to be 80, 262, and 406 counts per 15 s, respectively. Energy expenditure estimates differed between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph ( P < .05). The intra- and interinstrument coefficient of variation of the Actiwatch ranged between 0.72% and 8.4%.
Conclusion
The wrist-worn Actiwatch appears to be valid and reliable for estimating energy expenditure and physical activity intensity in children aged 8 to 10 years.
Human Kinetics Journals