Humans are inclined to perceive faces in everyday objects with a face-like configuration. This illusion, known as face pareidolia, is often attributed to a specialized network of'face cells' in primates. We found that face cells in macaque inferotemporal cortex responded selectively to pareidolia images, but this selectivity did not require a holistic, face-like configuration, nor did it encode human faceness ratings. Instead, it was driven mostly by isolated object parts that are perceived as eyes only within a face-like context. These object parts lack usual characteristics of primate eyes, pointing to the role of lower-level features. Our results suggest that face-cell responses are dominated by local, generic features, unlike primate visual perception, which requires holistic information. These findings caution against interpreting neural activity through the lens of human perception. Doing so could impose human perceptual biases, like seeing faces where none exist, onto our understanding of neural activity.